Compensation Funds for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence - Legal Approach: between E-Personhood and Financial Solidarity

Authors

  • Oana Florentina Ispas Institute of Legal Research "Acad. Andrei Rădulescu", Romanian Academy Author

Keywords:

artificial intelligence; civil liability; compensation funds; electronic person; mandatory insurance

Abstract

This paper explores how civil law adapts to the challenges posed by the “black box” nature of artificial intelligence systems, addressing the inherent uncertainties of liability when automated decisions cause harm. The research focuses on the expansion of strict liability through the revision of Directive 85/374/EEC and Proposal COM(2022) 496, which introduce presumptions of causation and transparency obligations for AI operators, without abandoning the legal mechanism of fault-based liability. In contrast, the theoretical concept of the “electronic person” risks, in a potential future scenario, easing the burden of human accountability, while financial solidarity schemes—such as mandatory insurance and compensation funds—could offer concrete protection to injured parties without discouraging innovation. In the Romanian context, the explicit support expressed through Senate Decision No. 166/2022 and the establishment of the Romanian Committee for Artificial Intelligence underscore the need for a hybrid framework that combines procedural adaptations with collective financial instruments to ensure full compensation for damages and a balance between public safety and innovation.

References

Bryson, J., Diamantis, M., & Grant, T. (2017). Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3), 273–291.

Erdélyi, O. J. (2021). The AI Liability Puzzle and a Fund-Based Work-Around. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70, 1309–1334. Preluat de pe https://jair.org/index.php/jair/article/download/12580/26674

Lima, G., & Cha, M. (2020). Responsible AI and Its Stakeholders. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES 2020). doi:10.1145/3375627.3375853

Novelli, C., Casolari, F., Hacker, P., Spedicato, G., & Floridi, L. (2024). Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecurity. Computer Law & Security Review, volume 55. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106066

Wagner, G. (2023). Liability Rules for the Digital Age – Aiming for the Brussels Effect. Humboldt-Universität Berlin. Working Paper No. 10. Preluat de pe https://www.rewi.hu-berlin.de/de/lf/oe/rdt/pub/wagner-liability-rules-for-the-digital-age-1.pdf

European Commission. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence. February 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence_en

European Parliament. Resolution of 16 February 2017 on civil law rules on robotics. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/ document/TA-8-2017-0051_RO.html

European Commission. Proposal for a Directive COM(2022) 496 final on the adaptation of non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/?uri=CELEX: 52022PC0496

Law no. 240/2004 on the liability of producers for defective products, as amended.

Romanian Senate. Decision no. 166/2022 on the Proposal for a Directive COM(2022) 496 final on liability in the field of AI. Official Monitor, Part I, no. 1163/05.12.2022.

Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalisation. Order no. 20.484/2023 on the establishment of the Romanian Committee for Artificial Intelligence. Official Gazette, Part I, no. 393/08.05.2023.

Downloads

Published

30.11.2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Compensation Funds for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence - Legal Approach: between E-Personhood and Financial Solidarity. (2024). Analele Universității Hyperion. Drept și Administrație Publică, 3(1), 58-63. https://auhdap.drept.hyperion.ro/index.php/law/article/view/50