Digitized Constitutionality Under The Rule Of Law In Romania
Keywords:
Constitutional Court; rule of law; constitutionalism; constitutional justice; digitizationAbstract
In its evolution, the Constitutional Court went through an extensive process of consolidation in the institutional architecture of Romania. This must keep pace with the process of modernizing the activity of public authorities from the perspective of the digitalization phenomenon, the effectiveness of which has been particularly revealed in recent years. That is why we consider that the complex theme of our research, digitized constitutionality, is appropriate and exciting, in equal measure, because the direction towards which we, and the whole world, are heading is that of simplifying and rationalizing the activity of public authorities and institutions, of eliminating bureaucracy and waste of human time and energy. The way of carrying out the activity of public authorities has changed significantly, from the "chemical pencil" of a century and a half ago to the technical means that have the role of simplifying and streamlining the relations between these entities and the beneficiaries of the services they provide. We note that this concern of our constitutional court is part of the efforts necessary for the modernization process, maintaining the natural balance between the authority of the state and the citizen, which must preserve its essence, regardless of how much science and technology will leave their mark on these reports
References
M. Crozier, “État modest, État moderne. Stratégies pour un autre changement/ Modest state, modern state. Strategies for another change, Fayard, Paris, 1987;
Marius Andreescu, Claudia Andreescu, Statul de drept. Semnificații constituționale și jurisprudențiale contemporane/ The rule of law. Contemporary constitutional and jurisprudential meanings, în Revista Universul Juridic, preluată de pe site-ul: http://revista.universuljuridic.ro/statul-de-drept-semnificatii-constitutionale-si-jurisprudentiale.
Cristian Clipa, Între statul ideologizat și statul savant/ Between the ideologized state and the scholarly state, www.banatulazi.ro.
M. Andreescu, A. Puran, Drept constituțional. Teoria generală a statului/ Constitutional law. General theory of the state, Editura C.H. Beck, București, 2018, pp. 65-75.
O. Duhamel, I. Meny, Dictionnaire constitutionnel/ Constitutional Dictionary, PUF, Paris, 1992, pp. 972-975.
Ioan Muraru, Elena-Simina Tănăsescu, Drept constitutional/ Constitutional Law, Editura All Beck, București, 2003.
Denis Alland, Stéphane Rials, Constitutionnalisme/ Constitutionalism, „Dictionnaire de la culture juridique/ Dictionary of Legal Culture”, Editions Quadrige/Lamy-PUF, Paris, 2012, p. 266.
Mircea Duțu, Nașterea, evoluția și perspectivele de afirmare ale constituționalismului românesc. Apartenență europeană și puternică vocație națională/ The birth, evolution and prospects for affirmation of Romanian constitutionalism. European belonging and strong national vocation, Studii Şi Cercetări Juridice/ Legal Studies And Research, an 11 (67), nr. 3, Bucureşti, iulie–septembrie, 2022, pp. 323-349.
Mălina Tebieş, Curtea Constituţională a României - evoluţia, caracteristicile şi modul de funcţionare a acesteia. Analiza câtorva aspecte controversate ilustrate prin considerentele Deciziei Curţii Constituţionale nr. 152 din 06 mai 2020/ The Constitutional Court of Romania - its evolution, characteristics and functioning. Analysis of several controversial aspects illustrated by the considerations of the Constitutional Court Decision no. 152 of May 6, 2020, Universul Juridic Premium nr. 5/2020.
Sergiu I. Stănilă, Tehnologia informației și comunicațiilor în procesul judiciar/ Information and communication technology in the judicial process,, Universul Juridic, 14 aprilie 2020, https://www.universuljuridic.ro/tehnologia-informatiei-si-comunicatiilor.
Laura Stănilă, Artificial intelligence: A challenge for criminal law, în Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Scientific Conference „Archibald Reiss Days”, vol. I, Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies Belgrade, 2018, pp. 163-175,
Laura Stănilă, Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights. A challenging Approach, Journal of Eastern European Criminal Law, nr. 2/2018, pp. 19-30;
Laura Stănilă, Inteligența artificială: o provocare pentru dreptul penal/ Artificial Intelligence: A Challenge for Criminal Law, Revista de drept penal al afacerilor/ Business Criminal Law Journal nr. 2/2018, pp. 75-93;
Laura Stănilă, Artificial intelligence and human rights. Evolution or involution?, Conference proceedings: Towards a Beter Future: Democracy, vol.I, Bitola, 2019, pp. 211-222;
Laura Stănilă, Inteligența artificială și sistemul de justiție penală – Instrumentele de evaluare a riscului penal/ Artificial Intelligence and the Criminal Justice System – Criminal Risk Assessment Tools, Revista de drept penal al afacerilor/ Business Criminal Law Journal nr. 3/2019, pp. 130-157.
Donato Silvano Lorusso, Law Report: The Telematic Process in Italy, NYSBA International Law Practicum, 2014, Vol. 27, No.2, http://www.blblex.it/pubblicazioni.php?id=317&lang=it.
Simon Nora, Alain Minc, The Computerization of the Society, The MIT Press, 1981.
M. Fabri citat de Marco Velicogna, Justice Systems and ICT. What can be learned from Europe?, Utrecht Law Review Vol. 3, Issue 1: 129-147, Iunie 2007
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Valentin-Stelian BĂDESCU (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
